QKS Group works with technology vendors through memberships, advisory engagements, and reprint licenses. Some of the companies we work with are also evaluated in our research. We believe the important question is not whether a commercial relationship exists. It is whether that relationship can influence the research. At QKS Group, our commercial and research processes are kept separate, and our assessments remain independent of commercial decisions.
One research view for everyone
Vendors and technology buyers have access to the same published research and evaluation criteria
Research decisions stay separate
Commercial teams do not approve, influence, or change research assessments.
Every vendor can receive an unfavourable assessment
A commercial relationship does not guarantee a positive position or outcome in our research.
The Ledger
Understanding a research firm’s independence starts with understanding the boundaries around its commercial relationships. Here is a clear view of the services QKS Group offers, and the areas that remain outside commercial influence.
Research Governance
Research quality depends on having a clear process and clear ownership at every stage. At QKS Group, research moves through defined review points, with responsibilities separated between research, analysts, and commercial teams.
01
Criteria Set & Published
Research Director’s Office
Evaluation criteria are established and published before the assessment process begins.
02
Evaluation
Covering Analyst
The covering analyst conducts the evaluation using the published criteria and available evidence.
03
Fact-Check & Debrief
Analyst + Vendor
The vendor has an opportunity to review factual information, provide clarification, and address inaccuracies.
04
Sign-Off
Research Director’s Office
The research team reviews the completed assessment before final approval.
05
Publication
Research
The final assessment is published by the research team.
The final assessment is published by the research team.
Fees are not tied to research outcomes. There are no success fees, bonuses, or commercial conditions linked to a vendor's research position or rating. Commercial engagement does not create an obligation to produce a favourable finding.
The same process applies to every vendor
The evaluation, fact-check, and review process applies whether or not a vendor has a commercial relationship with QKS Group. Commercial engagement does not create an alternative research process.
Coverage follows the research agenda
The markets and vendors covered by QKS Group are determined by our research agenda and methodology. A commercial relationship does not guarantee inclusion in a research study, nor does the absence of one prevent consideration.
Disputes route here, never to sales. Bring evidence — a fact we got wrong, a capability we assessed as unproven that you can prove — and it goes to the Research Director's office. Your account manager Disagreements go through the research process, not the commercial team.
If a vendor believes a finding is factually incorrect, it can provide evidence to the research team for review. The research team evaluates the evidence and determines whether a correction is warranted. Where QKS Group identifies an error, we correct the published research and clearly communicate what was changed. help you, and will not try; that is the point. If we were wrong, the correction is published and we say what changed.
The Test We Apply To Ourselves
Before any engagement is offered commercially, it has to pass one test: can it return a verdict the client does not want? If it cannot, it isn't research — it's a document with our logo on it, and we won't sell it.
GTM Validation Advisory
A vendor pays us to test their growth strategy. The assessment can conclude the strategy will not work — and says so, in the deliverable they paid for.
CAN RETURN: "DON'T FUND THIS"
Business Case Validation
A vendor pays us to validate their ROI claim. The analysis can conclude the evidence does not support the number they've been marketing.
CAN RETURN: "YOUR ROI CLAIM FAILS"
Technology Sourcing Advisory
A buyer pays us to advise on a shortlist. The advice can be that none of the shortlisted vendors — including ones who are our clients — fit their requirement.
CAN RETURN: "NONE OF THEM"
A verdict you can only receive in one direction is not a verdict. It's a purchase.
The Other Line
The independence question usually focuses on money. The subtler risk is authorship — the point at which an analyst stops assessing a company and starts working for it.
The moment we write your strategy, we can no longer assess it. So we don't write it.
QKS does not author vendor roadmaps, build go-to-market plans, craft positioning, or co-create the materials a vendor takes to market. We tell you what the market looks like, where buyers are going, what the evidence supports, and where your claims fail. What you do with that is your company's decision, made by your people — which is the only arrangement under which our next assessment of you means anything.
The same line runs on the buyer side: we advise on the decision, we do not run the implementation. An advisor who is also the systems integrator has an opinion about which system you should integrate.
Both Sides Of The Room
This page is linked from every commercial page we publish — the vendor pages and the enterprise pages alike. That is deliberate. The two audiences read the same document, because a firewall that needs a different explanation for each side is not a firewall.
The vendor asks
"If we pay you, does our rating improve?"
No. Ratings are identical for clients and non-clients, and no commercial team sees an assessment before it publishes. If money moved the rating, the rating would be worthless — and so would the reprint you wanted to license.
The buyer asks
"Is the research you're showing me bought by the vendors in it?"
No. Vendors buy access, advice, and the right to reprint what we published. They cannot buy what we published. Every vendor in our research was evaluated whether they paid us anything or not — most paid nothing.
Both answers have to survive the other audience reading them. That constraint is the most useful discipline in this business, and it is why the doctrine lives on one page instead of being tailored on six.
That sentence is the whole of our commercial model, and every page on this site is downstream of it. If you find us falling short of anything stated here, tell us — that is what the Research Director's office is for.